by KrayolaKat » Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:41 pm
guest wrote:They laid off NOT ONE manager, not one. For the salary a manager makes, they could have kept 2 or 3 of the little people. WTF?!
Typical Gannett B.S.!! Paper pushers - Managers... that's all they are. Granted some are good people... but they are no more valuable than the talented people they are laying off. Shame, Shame, Shameful!!

[b][quote="guest"]They laid off NOT ONE manager, not one. For the salary a manager makes, they could have kept 2 or 3 of the little people. WTF?![/quote][/b]
Typical Gannett B.S.!! Paper pushers - Managers... that's all they are. Granted some are good people... but they are no more valuable than the talented people they are laying off. Shame, Shame, Shameful!! :evil: